Zaterdag 9 mei 2026 — Editie #9

RainbowNews

The global platform for LGBTQ+ news, analysis and stories. Independent and inclusive.

NederlandsUKGlobalDeutschFrançaisEspañolBrasilAsia-PacificLatinoamérica
Politics

RFK Jr. backs tanning salons for kids but rejects gender care for trans youth

RFK Jr. wants to allow children in tanning salons, yet opposes gender-affirming care for transgender youth. Critics argue the decision reflects politics, not medical evidence.

RainbowNews EditorialMay 8, 2026 — United States3 min read
···

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is America's new Health Secretary. He has made some unexpected decisions. He wants to permit children to use tanning salons. Yet he opposes gender-affirming care for transgender youth.

Many people find this quite perplexing. Tanning salons use UV light. UV light increases skin cancer risk. Medical experts warn tanning beds harm children. The American Academy of Dermatology agrees entirely. They state no child should use tanning beds.

Gender-affirming care differs significantly. This care supports transgender young people. It may include therapy, hormones, or medical support. Many doctors endorse this care. Leading medical organisations say it is safe and vital. Research shows it improves transgender youth wellbeing. It also lowers depression and suicide rates.

So why does RFK Jr. back one and reject the other? Critics argue it is not science-based. It is not about protecting children. They say it reflects politics and personal views. Tanning salons appeal in certain communities. Opposing transgender care appeals to some political groups.

LGBTQ+ advocates are upset. They say transgender youth face countless difficulties. They experience bullying, discrimination, and mental struggles. Removing their healthcare worsens the situation. A young trans person without support faces greater risks. They are more likely to feel isolated and depressed.

Health decisions must rely on facts. They must follow medical research. Doctors and scientists should guide these choices. Not politicians. Not personal opinions.

The contrast is striking and concerning. One decision ignores known health risks. The other removes proven health benefits. Both decisions affect children. But only one group receives protection.

LGBTQ+ organisations throughout the United States are responding firmly. They are urging lawmakers to protect transgender youth. They want healthcare decisions between patients, families, and doctors. Political involvement in medical care is harmful. Especially when targeting vulnerable young people.

RE

RainbowNews Editorial

Editor

Part of the RainbowNews editorial team.

Meer van deze auteur →

More in Politiek